<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="todaycom/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miley Cyrus Topless Pose For Vanity Affair Raises Questions</title>
	<link>http://breakingnews.today.com/2008/04/28/miley-cyrus-topless-pose-for-vanity-affair/</link>
	<description>Keeping You Informed</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: christyz</title>
		<link>http://breakingnews.today.com/2008/04/28/miley-cyrus-topless-pose-for-vanity-affair/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>christyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 01:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breakingnews.today.com/2008/04/28/miley-cyrus-topless-pose-for-vanity-affair/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hi Judy,

No, it definitely doesn't seem fair does it? Vanity Affair's editing actually sexualized the photo more than the original, if you watch the video of the photo shoot you'll see the shot looks fairly innocent. But then they have to take a picture of a fifteen year old and make it into something sleazy in order to sell more magazines. It's unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Judy,</p>
<p>No, it definitely doesn&#8217;t seem fair does it? Vanity Affair&#8217;s editing actually sexualized the photo more than the original, if you watch the video of the photo shoot you&#8217;ll see the shot looks fairly innocent. But then they have to take a picture of a fifteen year old and make it into something sleazy in order to sell more magazines. It&#8217;s unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://breakingnews.today.com/2008/04/28/miley-cyrus-topless-pose-for-vanity-affair/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://breakingnews.today.com/2008/04/28/miley-cyrus-topless-pose-for-vanity-affair/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>How come Vanity Fair wasn't prosecuted for corrupting a minor? How come child protective services didn't take custody? Look what Texas CPS did to the poor FLDS children based on a phony phone call and no other evidence. At the same time the exploitation by parents of people like Brittney Spears and her sister are just winked at in the media. Seems the media favors debauchery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come Vanity Fair wasn&#8217;t prosecuted for corrupting a minor? How come child protective services didn&#8217;t take custody? Look what Texas CPS did to the poor FLDS children based on a phony phone call and no other evidence. At the same time the exploitation by parents of people like Brittney Spears and her sister are just winked at in the media. Seems the media favors debauchery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


